Treatment or Drug Court? Understand Your Options Before You Decide

Families facing a loved one’s addiction often ask whether a Marchman Act petition or drug court is the better route. The short answer: the Marchman Act runs through its own court petition, not through a criminal case. That difference shapes which path is realistic. This guide compares involuntary treatment vs drug court in Florida, explains each track in plain terms, and lists what to gather before you decide.

Why Families Confuse the Marchman Act and Drug Court

Both routes can lead to substance use treatment ordered by a judge, so families often treat them as the same thing. They are not. Drug court is a treatment program that a county may fund for people in the justice system.

The core difference is where the case lives. A Marchman Act petition starts its own court matter. Drug court is offered inside a criminal case, so the charge or sentence drives the timeline. For an overview of the Marchman Act track, read our involuntary commitment for addiction guide.

How a Marchman Act Petition Works in Florida

A Marchman Act petition asks a court to order an assessment and, if the legal test is met, treatment for an adult with substance abuse impairment. The law sets a good-faith standard.

For an adult, a spouse or legal guardian, any relative, a service provider, or an adult with direct personal knowledge of the person’s substance abuse impairment and their prior course of assessment and treatment may file (§ 397.68112). The person who files is the petitioner. The person named in the petition is the respondent.

It must also list the facts behind the request (§ 397.68141). Those facts explain why the petitioner believes the person is impaired and has lost self-control. They also explain the risk of harm to self or others, or why impaired judgment blocks a sound choice about care.

The clerk may not charge a filing fee for it (§ 397.681). In Miami-Dade, the Clerk’s Mental Health Court page directs adults seeking this relief to the Probate Court. Location matters. In J.P. v. J.N., a Florida appeals court held that filing in the wrong county did not take away the circuit court’s jurisdiction. Filing the petition in the wrong county, however, did not divest the Putnam County circuit court of jurisdiction, as the court explained in J.P. v. J.N..

At the hearing, the petitioner must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the person is impaired, has a history of not complying with treatment, and, because of the impairment, is unlikely to take part in recommended services voluntarily or cannot decide whether services are needed, and also either, without services, is likely to suffer from neglect that poses a real and present threat of substantial harm and is substantially likely to cause serious bodily harm to themselves or another in the near future, as evidenced by recent behavior, or refuses care because of judgment so impaired they cannot see their need for it (§ 397.6957). The respondent has a right to counsel at every stage, although the respondent may waive that right if the respondent is present and the court finds that such waiver is made knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily (§ 397.681). A Florida appeals court has also held that a respondent has a constitutional right to counsel in these proceedings, as in Hillsborough County v. Albrechta. For what the person named in a petition should know, see our respondent rights guide.

How Drug Court Operates Inside a Criminal Case

Drug court is a court-supervised treatment program that starts with a criminal matter, not a family petition. Each county may fund a treatment-based drug court program for people in the justice system who have a substance abuse problem (§ 397.334). The response is tailored to how severe the problem is.

Entry depends on the stage of the case. Pretrial entry is voluntary. When s. 948.08(6)(c)1. does not apply, the court may order an eligible individual to enter a pretrial program only upon the individual’s written agreement, which must state that the individual understands the program’s requirements and potential sanctions for noncompliance. That agreement must say the person understands the program’s requirements and possible sanctions (§ 397.334). After a sentence, the court bases entry on criminal history, screening results, amenability to services, total sentence points, the recommendations of the state attorney and the victim, if any, and the defendant’s agreement.

Once enrolled, the participant follows a coordinated strategy set by a drug court team. That strategy can include a protocol of sanctions for noncompliance. The participant must receive it in writing before agreeing to enter. A court may also require a charged or convicted offender to receive services from a licensed provider (§ 397.705).

Side-by-Side: Marchman Act Petition vs. Drug Court Program

A family member or other eligible person starts a Marchman Act case. Drug court is reached through the criminal case instead.

Both tracks run on court orders, but they start from different places. Knowing what sets each one in motion helps you choose the right question to ask first.

Whether a Criminal Case Changes the Path

The right path depends on the facts, and a pending criminal case is often the biggest one. Without a criminal case, the Marchman Act petition is the court framework for a family seeking an assessment or treatment order. The statutory criteria focus on impairment and harm, not on a charge (§ 397.675).

If charges are pending, drug court and other criminal-court options may come into play. In that setting, the criminal case controls the timing. Family plans must follow the court calendar, not the other way around. A Marchman Act petition is a separate filing. A family should not assume it will resolve a pending charge. The two tracks can overlap in practice, so timing and coordination matter.

When a Criminal Case Is Involved

Robinson Casey focuses on Marchman Act petitions and guardianship matters. Criminal charges fall outside that focus, so a person facing them will need a criminal defense lawyer for that case. If a criminal lawyer already represents the person, sharing treatment plans with that lawyer helps keep both tracks aligned. The civil-court side and the criminal side should be planned together.

Talk Through Your Family’s Situation With Robinson Casey

Choosing between a court petition and a criminal-court program is a hard decision for a parent, spouse, or adult child. Start by writing down what you can show. Note the substance use, any harm or risk, prior treatment, and any charge or court date. A Marchman Act petition must state the respondent’s name, the petitioner’s name and relationship to the respondent, the respondent’s attorney if known, and the factual allegations establishing the need for involuntary services for substance abuse impairment (§ 397.68141).

The firm’s regional pages cover Miami-Dade and the wider South Florida area. Richard J. Casey III, Esq. is the responsible lawyer for this page.

Frequently Asked Questions